3 ms·
> The results show that our approach generates largely accurate API sequences OK then, humans still needed. Best case, it seems AI will take up what one would
by npalli 10y ago
> The results show that our approach generates largely accurate API sequences
OK then, humans still needed. Best case, it seems AI will take up what one would consider interesting work (algorithms, thinking) and humans will end up doing grunt work -- testing out bugs, cleaning up data, formatting data, explaining to other humans etc.
Realistically though, this just creates two API's (instead of one) for humans to master, the original API and the 99% accurate machine API and knowing where the gap/bugs are.
- reality_hacker 10y ago> humans will end up doing grunt work labeling training examples for deep learning
- skoocda 10y ago> this just creates two API's (instead of one) for humans to master Not really, it's one mega-mecha-meta-API instead of hundreds of disparate small ones. So you'd need to be able to find API bugs, I agree with that, but overall you'd probably need less knowledge. Especially if a large number of humans use this DeepAPI system, the bugs can be fixed relatively quickly.