3 ms·

"In reality, good meetings are good and bad meetings are not good". Yeah, because we'd rather read a book of tautologies than some actual points.

• foldr 17y ago
  I think you're missing his point. He's saying it would be more helpful if the authors explained what it is about bad meetings that makes them bad, rather than issuing a blanket condemnation on all meetings.
  • rimantas 17y ago
    Authors do explain. They even provide some guidelines how to make productive meeting. It's just the reviewer who chooses to ignore that.
    • foldr 17y ago
      He doesn't ignore it, he just points out that the slogans contradict the actual advice, which is pretty run-of-the-mill.