3 ms·
Yes, the property enforcement is involuntary, but in the absence of property slavery is not unethical. If there is no property, then why slaves have a better cl
by monort 10y ago
Yes, the property enforcement is involuntary, but in the absence of property slavery is not unethical. If there is no property, then why slaves have a better claim to their body and work, than someone else?
Either the idea of property is accepted implicitly, or it is ethical to enslave in some situations.
- aninhumer 10y agoI'm not sure I follow your reasoning? Are you suggesting that control of ones labour is inextricably linked to property rights? Being able to decide how to spend your time, and having exclusive access to particular resources are completely separate things.