3 ms·
Would be bikeshedding, but... I think there is some good intent in systemd's change. But they should have approached tmux/screen/community before making the ch
by awalGarg 10y ago
Would be bikeshedding, but...
I think there is some good intent in systemd's change. But they should have approached tmux/screen/community before making the change and a release which broke things. They should have asked for feedback and such and see if tmux is willing to do what they propose. Simply hammering over things as if you hold powers over other's codebases doesn't come off as very positive.
But oh well...
- qb45 10y agoOr at least a kind "hey, we are releasing this new crap, your software will stop working in 2 weeks".
- NeutronBoy 10y agoSome of the other comments in this thread indicate that tmux not confirming to the specification is a known issue that people have been trying to get fixed for a few years. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know how correct this is, but it appears that it's not an entirely one-sided argument.