3 ms·

Why do we need to standardize sandboxing if that means having to install an application to install applications that are supposed to not need external dependenc

Why do we need to standardize sandboxing if that means having to install an application to install applications that are supposed to not need external dependency handling? If Flatpak's main selling point is security, then it would be better served as as a sandboxing tool for AppImage rather than falling for NIH syndroming as is unfortunately too common in Red Hat's world.

digi_owl 10y ago
Because as the old name indicated, xdg-app is/was a Freedesktop project (though much of the docs are at Gnome, making one ponder porous project boundaries). And Freedesktop is all about defining that one canonical (heh) distro (making "free" something of a misnomer at best). Observe flatpak becoming part of Fedora shortly, and then Poettering style "nudging" implemented to get Debian and the rest to adopt it.
- EmanueleAina 10y ago
  No need to nudge, `xdg-app` for Debian has already been in the works for quite some time[1]. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813308 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813308
probonopd 10y ago
Actually the sandbox used for Flatpak can also be used to run AppImages already now: https://github.com/probonopd/AppImageKit/issues/152 https://github.com/probonopd/AppImageKit/issues/152