4 ms·
I think the writer presents interesting, if perhaps over-intellectualized, viewpoints. However, I don't believe him when he says he cannot find a real definiti
by eplanit 17y ago
I think the writer presents interesting, if perhaps over-intellectualized, viewpoints. However, I don't believe him when he says he cannot find a real definition of Fascism. I think that's deliberate, for if he included conventionally accepted definitions, the rest of his article would be non sequitur. I've always understood it to be a confusion on Patriotism, where people align their beliefs behind the _government_ instead of aligning with the principles of their country. Where principles are misunderstood, or rejected, or under attack -- fascism takes hold. The word certainly has nothing to do with athleticism.
In this more conventional meaning, I fail to make the connections that the author makes re: Avatar.
- CWuestefeld 17y agoI'm afraid the OP has it right here. From Wikipedia: What constitutes a definition of fascism and fascist governments is a highly disputed subject that has proved complicated and contentious. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fascism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fascism
- lurkinggrue 17y agoOne reason why I am likely it discount an argument that starts with calling something fascist. The word has been so misused as to be parody now. They may as well amend Goodwin's law.