4 ms·
It seems easier to use AppImage applications (as Flatpak requires its binary to be installed and works like a sort of package manager) and it looks easier to cr
by mixedCase 10y ago
It seems easier to use AppImage applications (as Flatpak requires its binary to be installed and works like a sort of package manager) and it looks easier to create FlatPak apps (create file, point to specific runtime dependencies, create package) than to create AppImage apps (https://github.com/probonopd/AppImageKit/wiki/Creating-AppImages https://github.com/probonopd/AppImageKit/wiki/Creating-AppIm...).
This inclines me towards AppImage, as the whole point is to have the easiest experience for the user.