38 ms·

The problem with that view, is that Linux distributions are free and maintained by a lot of people in their free time. (Yes, and many companies as well.) Your

The problem with that view, is that Linux distributions are free and maintained by a lot of people in their free time. (Yes, and many companies as well.) Your solution has to come in some form of contribution, and it has to be specific. The best thing would be artwork, code, etc. Even if all you can do is E-mail somebody who actually works on Ubuntu, and let them know what you'd rather have, I think that would help, too. What's "gigantic"? What's "ugly"? This would tell me nothing about how to make you happy. How about you tell them, "the text in this area here, in this particular program, is bigger than I'd like; and over here, in this program, I think having green would be better than brown". That kind of thing.

amock 17y ago
I think that part of the ugliness comes from having so many contributors and a culture that is used to things not having a consistent look and feel. On OS X almost all native programs look and feel the same way and the frameworks and tools encourage developers to follow Apple's human interface guidelines. When someone uses another toolkit, such as Qt, the apps just don't feel right. On Linux there is not single toolset and if there are human interface guidelines they don't seem to be followed. So the problem isn't that you need to change a few small things about some interfaces, it's that there needs to be a strongly consistent design that all programs follow.
- kalid 17y ago
  Agreed. It's frustrating using an inconsistent API (camelCase, under_score, different parameter orders, overlapping functionality, etc.). The UI is the API that users work with. Inconsistencies are frustrating.
pan69 17y ago
I wouldn't do that actually. Just emailing 'your' opinion to some of the developers might actually have the reverse effect. I do agree that if you complain you also need to come with a solution and a contribution of some sort. You might what to create your own Gnome theme and show the world how it should be done. If the rest of the world agrees with you your theme will be the number one downloaded theme on http://art.gnome.org http://art.gnome.org in no time.

amock 17y ago

I think that part of the ugliness comes from having so many contributors and a culture that is used to things not having a consistent look and feel. On OS X almost all native programs look and feel the same way and the frameworks and tools encourage developers to follow Apple's human interface guidelines. When someone uses another toolkit, such as Qt, the apps just don't feel right. On Linux there is not single toolset and if there are human interface guidelines they don't seem to be followed. So the problem isn't that you need to change a few small things about some interfaces, it's that there needs to be a strongly consistent design that all programs follow.

kalid 17y ago
Agreed. It's frustrating using an inconsistent API (camelCase, under_score, different parameter orders, overlapping functionality, etc.). The UI is the API that users work with. Inconsistencies are frustrating.

pan69 17y ago

I wouldn't do that actually. Just emailing 'your' opinion to some of the developers might actually have the reverse effect. I do agree that if you complain you also need to come with a solution and a contribution of some sort. You might what to create your own Gnome theme and show the world how it should be done. If the rest of the world agrees with you your theme will be the number one downloaded theme on http://art.gnome.org http://art.gnome.org in no time.