6 ms·
So yes, some of these gems don't need man-pages. I wasn't hoping for 100% man-page coverage (maybe an interesting tool to write, now that I think of it...), bu
by leif 17y ago
So yes, some of these gems don't need man-pages. I wasn't hoping for 100% man-page coverage (maybe an interesting tool to write, now that I think of it...), but better than one apart from the gem-man quasi-meta-manpage would be a start.
In particular, I'm thinking of things like rails, rspec, heroku, and the like, which, while primarily libraries, have cli components that badly need man pages. I can't tell you how many babies I've punched as a result of typing "man rails" or "man spec". It might be just me, but if it can be the first token in a shell command, I expect it to have a manpage, and it is almost (physically) shocking when that is not true.
(I do need that awk | sort | uniq, because I have multiple versions of unicorn that all show up with that command)