>If you accept the human brain is effectively a biological computer and that normal computers get more powerful every year then inevitably there's a point when

>If you accept the human brain is effectively a biological computer and that normal computers get more powerful every year then inevitably there's a point when they get more powerful (in terms of processing power and memory) than the biological ones. That doesn't give you anything like the right algorithms to run on the computers. MOore's Law has been ending, so that free ride to avoid taking asymptotic complexity seriously is over.