4 ms·
Ah, synthetic benchmarks. Are you really sure they're consistently twice as slow? Your link shows otherwise. mandelbrot 17% slower fannkuch-redux 34% slowe
by bitmapbrother 10y ago
Ah, synthetic benchmarks. Are you really sure they're consistently twice as slow? Your link shows otherwise.
mandelbrot 17% slower
fannkuch-redux 34% slower
fasta 38% slower
fasta-redux 39% slower
pidigits 44% slower
So much for predicting my next argument.
- CherryPickMuch 10y agoHow come you left out these ones? spectral-norm 115% slower reverse-compliment 121% slower n-body 136% slower regex-dna 235% slower k-nucleotide 253% slower Cherry picking your data shows you're either dishonest or really lost in your denial.
- bitmapbrother 10y agoPerhaps you should read his reply more carefully next time. He said the benchmarks were "consistently 2x" as slow. He was wrong and the rest of the synthetic benchmarks you posted just corroborated my point. As for being dishonest, well, you're commenting from a newly minted temp account so it would seem you didn't have the courage/backbone to use your real one.