4 ms·
Well, if you ask me, backward compatibility should only be broken with extreme reluctance, because it's a huge waste of time to be rewriting things that already
by shawkinaw 10y ago
Well, if you ask me, backward compatibility should only be broken with extreme reluctance, because it's a huge waste of time to be rewriting things that already work. See also Angular 2.
- fallenshell 10y agoThis was a major release. 2 to 3.