4 ms·
I must admit that I think that more clarity is a good thing. Would asking someone on a date be considered an "unwanted sexual advance"? Also, the term "unwante
by deftnerd 10y ago
I must admit that I think that more clarity is a good thing. Would asking someone on a date be considered an "unwanted sexual advance"?
Also, the term "unwanted" makes me wonder about the existence of a "wanted sexual advance".
I worry that this whole concept is too fraught with "gut feeling" decisions and that could cause injustice or liabilities.
It might be cleaner to say that romantic or sexual workplace relationships are forbidden and that extends to investors, contractors, suppliers, vendors, etc. if the relationship clause is violated, all the involved parties will be fired or banned from interacting with the company, with any owned shares seized.
Basically like zero-tolerance policies in public school applied to the business world. It's more harsh, but it's equally unfair to everyone.
- sarahnadav 10y agoremember- this isn't for within the company, this isn't a workplace relationship.(for the most part) this is about investors and founders. And just like you have to go to HR for an office relationship, you would need to do something similiar in a case like this