It's interesting in light of the recent discussions about advertising. Since this is pretty similar. "Meetings are toxic" is a sweeping generalization, which

It's interesting in light of the recent discussions about advertising. Since this is pretty similar. "Meetings are toxic" is a sweeping generalization, which is obviously false. But it gets a high clickthrough/buy book/etc so it's what they use. >> On the other hand, "Good meetings are good and bad meetings are not good" doesn't tell me anything. What is there to tell though? Make sure meetings are productive, and if they're not, have less of them or make them more productive :/ hardly rocket science is it?