3 ms·

I disagree, I find this practice disgusting and unhetical. You can't have it both ways, on the one hand be a regulated occupation given special status by the st

• maxharris 10y ago
  Would you support making medicine a free occupation that has no special state status? I think that going in that direction would do a lot of good.
  • r2dnb 10y ago
    My point is that as soon as the state creates artificial rules - for reasons I do not judge - you need to remain coherent to avoid an explosion of the system. - Protected free Press / diluted journalist accountability, manipulations and lies - Gender equality / systemic bias against men in judgements - thus creating a new form of inequality - Plug your own To answer your message, I am not necessarily saying that free press or gender equality is bad. What I am saying is that these systemic incoherences are killing our societies right now because they are at best down played and at worst treated as afterthoughts like what you do here. It's not because the regulation seems right that we should ignore the side effects. When you decide to take the role of God - not judging if it's right or wrong - you've got to be at the level of the task. Doctors have enough protections and benefits to be expected to behave in the market following particular ethics and a particular code of conduct. The article outlines many ways they can protect their best interests while remaining compliant and keeping the system consistent.