4 ms·
If you see below, I clarified what I meant, but admittedly just a thought expiriment. However, it would certianly not be dooggooders. It would be a group of sel
by vonklaus 10y ago
If you see below, I clarified what I meant, but admittedly just a thought expiriment. However, it would certianly not be dooggooders. It would be a group of self-interested companies colluding to kill patent trolls to protect themselves from future litigation. e.g. if you can't beatem join em. Which if such a strategy were workable, i would hath ideological confliction about anyway. But I guess, I am surprised (or am missing something key) about why this has not been done as they are going against very smart and very well funded companies, it is their business model.
Apple could buy the troll suing it hundreds of times over(although assuredly it isn't for sale now) so patent trolling could be limited if they were stopped within the mareket. It is already a risky investment as they must litigate smaller companies to prove the patents as they gain the crediblity to go after larger ones.
Small companies are fighting them in court, big companies are fighting them in court, it makes sense that we take the fight to the market, and hurt them financially as well.
- niij 10y agoMy point is that this would not hurt them financially. Once the trolls got enough publicity where this anti-troll group was going to try to take over the company then the trolls just sell their stock in the company (making $$$$$) and let the anti-troll group shut it down.