Seems like he just cherry-picked the negative comments. That'd be fine, but choosing not to mention this kind of hurts his argument. (Could have titled the arti

Seems like he just cherry-picked the negative comments. That'd be fine, but choosing not to mention this kind of hurts his argument. (Could have titled the article "Six Years of Twilio Doubters on Hacker News" or something more clever than I can come up with.) The comment he gives for "Twilio Launches UK SMS" is from the bottom of the page with one or more downvotes. Meanwhile, the first comment on that page says "Awesome work Twilio, been looking forward to being able to play around with SMS as much as I have calls without having to use a US number."