3 ms·
Because air is not very good at moving heat, so it's more efficient to use water or some sort of refrigerant.
by JshWright 10y ago
Because air is not very good at moving heat, so it's more efficient to use water or some sort of refrigerant.
- CyberDildonics 10y agoIn the context of a heat pump yes, but what I'm saying is why not cycle the air of a building underground directly? I would think lots of air would be moved for very little energy and could be put through an underground radiator with lots of surface area. Even with a heat pump, air has to be passed over the evaporation coils anyway.
- JshWright 10y agoIf you're trying to cool a building, the goal isn't moving air, it's moving heat. Pushing air around is a convenient way of moving that heat around inside a structure, but it's a lousy way of changing the total amount of heat inside the structure.
- CyberDildonics 10y agoBut again a heat pump is still running air over the evaporation coils so how does that end up better than having a radiator underground?
- JshWright 10y agoThe amount of surface area you would need to have underground to expose the air to would be tremendous. The reason heat exchangers work is because they substantially concentrate the heat (or the 'cold'), reducing the surface area needed.