3 ms·
The problem is not so much one of competition. The problem is where that competition is directed. Einstein, Salk, Tesla, Marconi, etc. These people were't co
by nickthemagicman 10y ago
The problem is not so much one of competition. The problem is where that competition is directed.
Einstein, Salk, Tesla, Marconi, etc.
These people were't competing with other humans. They were competing with and seeking some dominance over NATURE.
Competing with other humans is a very tribalistic primitive behavior. Like gangs of chimps in a forest.
We need some outer force to compete against instead of turning on each other.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- GrumpyYoungMan 10y agoThat's a rather romantic view of scientific progress but the actual history is not as nice. I think you're forgetting about the rivalry Edison had with Tesla, at the very least. In academia, fighting over who published/made a discovery first (and therefore gets the credit) are depressingly common. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_priority_disputes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scientific_priority_di..., which includes Einstein, Marconi, and Tesla). Today, most STEM researchers won't talk about their research results before publication for fear of getting scooped. Competition is very much alive and well (not to mention quite vicious) even in the pursuit of knowledge.
- uremog 10y agoI have a researcher friend whose paper was rejected from publication because another paper had similar research. The thing is, that other paper cited a draft of his own paper (the one that was denied). Fights over "who came first" are definitely still alive and may not even involve the primary stakeholders.