3 ms·
I'm not sure I agree. I use one phone, with many apps, so it's helpful if the common parts of all the apps I use behave in the same way. For example, how do I
by tomn 10y ago
I'm not sure I agree. I use one phone, with many apps, so it's helpful if the common parts of all the apps I use behave in the same way.
For example, how do I get to the preferences for this app? Via a hamburger menu on the left, or an ellipsis menu on the right?
Almost all the apps on my phone that have the concept of making a new item (SMS/instant message/email/calendar event) have the button for doing so in exactly the same place on the screen; this is great as it means only have to learn that action once, and it works for all the apps I use. That is optimised user interface design.
Of course designers still need to put in effort to make their apps usable, but making having the common subset of actions work the same across apps is great for users.
It's unfortunate that platforms seem to change their interface guidelines all the time (no just the look and feel), as it seems to be having the opposite of the intended effect. The cost benefits of having a single style for an app across platforms is also a significant factor; I'd rather have an app available on my platform than not.
- k__ 10y agoI think it is a matter of design skills. If someone wants to make an app, that is better than the rest, they need a unique selling point. If it's bad, people like you won't use it. If it's like all the other ones on the marked, you will use the one with the best marketing. If it's really better than what you are used to, you will ditch the rest. I think: Strife for the last one, but don't get butthurt, when the experiment fails.