3 ms·
"but when you reach 7,825, it is impossible for every Pythagorean triple to be multicoloured" So they didn't know in advance how long it was going to take or t
by cantagi 10y ago
"but when you reach 7,825, it is impossible for every Pythagorean triple to be multicoloured"
So they didn't know in advance how long it was going to take or the size of the output?
- ColinWright 10y agoCorrect. They didn't even know if there was a finite number where colouring became impossible, but it was strongly believed there was such a limit. Privately, people had their own ideas - sort of Fermi estimates. I don't know anyone who made such estimates public.
- dmichulke 10y agoExactly, the program would have never halted if it were possible to colour all triples. Worse even, no one would know why it wouldn't halt... In other words, you have to be lucky to find a counterexample to the given assumption otherwise you're stuck publishing an increased lower bound