3 ms·
Is that your libertarian rationalisation against copyright? Because with that kind of logic we couldn't have contracts either (breaching a contract can be non-v
by olalonde 10y ago
Is that your libertarian rationalisation against copyright? Because with that kind of logic we couldn't have contracts either (breaching a contract can be non-violent).
> And where does copying end, and thought begin?
In the same way we decide when a person becomes legally major. We draw whichever arbitrary line seems to make the most sense.
- tremon 10y agowith that kind of logic we couldn't have contracts either That a false equivalence, contracts are between two parties who both have no grant of violence.
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]