here's a great rebuttal to that: http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/no-hillary-did-not-commit-a-crime-at-least-based-on-what-we-know-today/ http://lawnewz.com/hig

here's a great rebuttal to that: http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/no-hillary-did-not-commit-a-crime-at-least-based-on-what-we-know-today/ http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/no-hillary-did-not-commit-a-... using this statue to prosecute would not only violate the spirit and intent of the law but also be very unlikely, given precedent, to result in any conviction. Hence a competent prosecutor would likely not seek to prosecute based on this law, nor should they, as it would be a waste of taxpayer money not to mention the ill effect it would have on our electoral process (sudden unnecessary prosecution against particular candidates unlikely to lead anywhere).