3 ms·
One useful thing to note is that a gigantic amount of information is publicly accessible, but in one or more of the following states: * Requires effort to acce
by ubernostrum 10y ago
One useful thing to note is that a gigantic amount of information is publicly accessible, but in one or more of the following states:
* Requires effort to access
* Is in out-of-the-way places many people don't know about
* Is in a form that's difficult to consume
Even though it's "public", in many ways it behaves as if it isn't, since until one of those conditions is removed people don't really bother to access it, pay attention to it, or try to consume it.
In other words, it's one of those "if a tree falls in the forest and nobody's around to hear it" situations.
So information which is only available to someone with an account, but on a system which grants accounts for free to anyone who wants one, typically is thus seen as "private" or at least in a "not really public" state until such time as someone massively aggregates it and makes it available to people without accounts, as happened with OKCupid.
- meshko 10y agoThe real problem here is that a) OKCupid doesn't have reasonable default settings and opts people in by default to have their information available for sale b) that they don't sufficiently deidentify information they sell. People who release the information are leveling the playing field. I don't think this can be called unethical _easily_.
- fredophile 10y agoAlthough I've seen reports that OKCupid does sell some information and they're almost certainly using demographic information for advertising I haven't heard of them selling insufficiently anonymized information. Do you have a citation for this?