4 ms·
Thanks. I removed this because I felt it was unfair on Windows. Windows has strange things in it, but then Raymond Chen will write a post clearly explaining it,
by cturner 10y ago
Thanks. I removed this because I felt it was unfair on Windows. Windows has strange things in it, but then Raymond Chen will write a post clearly explaining it, and they are strong on backwards compatibility. Everything you say is true. But you can read docs and write in C and work to a conclusion. Systemd is shaping up to be a layer of complexity that constantly shifts underneath you. It is going to be a nightmare for people who build on unix. The unix api and conventions are our bedrock. This is not sustainable.
- AnonymousPlanet 10y agoSystemd might become stable at some point, but I'm more and more getting the idea that yanking Linux away from that Unix bedrock is the very purpose of it.
- digi_owl 10y agoIt may well be. Not sure if i can produce a link off hand. But Poettering seems to be on record about having no interest in unix.