3 ms·
I am aware of that difference. As a company Twitter is not a cash cow.
by argonaut 10y ago
I am aware of that difference. As a company Twitter is not a cash cow.
- malchow 10y agoAs a few dozen people managing a webapp on AWS from home while eating udon noodles, it'd be a cash cow.
- the_watcher 10y agoExactly. Twitter earned nearly $600M last quarter. Claiming that it has not successfully monetized is simply false.
- argonaut 10y agoI know people who have worked at Twitter. Twitter's systems cannot be run, even in maintenance mode, by only a few people on AWS. Not only would Twitter crash / crawl to a halt on AWS, but that's not even enough people.
- the_watcher 10y agoSure, but the statement that they were unable to monetize the product is incorrect. They have successfully monetized the product. They (so far) have been unable to keep the user base growing at a rate that a public company generally requires.
- argonaut 10y agoI didn't say they would be exactly the same company. They would just be in the same position.