42 ms·
This seems to be a common story. Systemd breaks one thing, but it's okay, they have their own built-in thing.
by codehusker 10y ago
This seems to be a common story. Systemd breaks one thing, but it's okay, they have their own built-in thing.
- toyg 10y agoOr rather, systemd breaks an entire class of things, but it's okay, they have one and only one built-in thing.
- misnome 10y agoIt seems like the attitude "If you don't closely follow systemd development then you are an idiot and deserve what you get" is the most common. You shouldn't expect thousands and thousands of users to have to reconfigure to maintain existing, standard behaviour.