3 ms·

2.x or 3.x?

• c22 10y ago
  I understand a lot of people whinge about this, but converting most of my 2.x code to 3.x code involved nothing more than adding brackets to my print statements.
  • ethbro 10y ago
    Not meaning to trivialize your experience, and I'm sure that's true for a lot of projects. But on the other hand, big enterprise and government tend to accumulate projects that were written over decades of change cycles. Porting something like that across a non-backwards-compatible version bump while preserving identical behavior which is sparsely documented and uncovered by unit tests? Starts to be a serious amount of effort quickly.