These are the options according to the author. Option 1. Thiel clandestinely funds lawsuits. This makes him a Bad Man, distributing cats paws and using them t

These are the options according to the author. Option 1. Thiel clandestinely funds lawsuits. This makes him a Bad Man, distributing cats paws and using them to pervert the public interest. Option 2. Thiel openly funds lawsuits. This enables him to: 2.1. Give a heads up to his adversaries. Sporting chance perhaps. 2.2. Be vilified as contributing to chilling effects by spreading fear of being sued in the media establishment. Needless to say the Bad Man is perverting the public interest. Huh. His logic just eats itself. He also says a number of things about the law I suspect cannot be true since he has to fall back on claiming Thiel is defying the laws of countries that don't exist today and which in any case would not apply to the United States if they did. I don't have the time to critique his other claims, I really don't.