3 ms·
Meet the hot new Web interface: fingers
- PaddyCorry 17y agoWithout meaning to be controversial, this is just for anyone else like me, who was a little uncertain what Christian Science (not that there's anything wrong with that) is : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Science http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Science
- gjm11 17y agoThe Christian Science Monitor is a reasonably reputable newspaper; in particular it is not generally a propaganda outlet for Christian Science or for political views particularly congenial to Christian Scientists. Some description here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Christian_Science_Monitor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Christian_Science_Monitor .
- yummyfajitas 17y agoFurther, regardless of whether their political views bias their reporting, it's highly unlikely that their political views biased this story.
- sireat 17y agoCompared to publications like Washington Times, CSM is a paragon of virtue in the world of journalism. Seems whenever I come upon an article from CSM it is well written and does not show an open bias. Admittedly, I've never read their religious editorials.
- Sukotto 17y agoThere is also this, from a couple of years back: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/09/programmings-dirtiest-little-secret.html http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/09/programmings-dirties...
- Jim72 17y agoWell what else am I supposed to use? My toes?
- Jim72 17y agoMy apologies. I just joined and did not realize sarcasm wasn't accepted. It will be hard, as I am by nature a cynic. However, However, after better reviewing the welcome page here, I agree with the no drama edict. Once again, my apologies.