Still, I don't think LANDR is intended for people who can regularly afford professional mastering. It's like saying netbooks are going to devalue the Macbook.

Still, I don't think LANDR is intended for people who can regularly afford professional mastering. It's like saying netbooks are going to devalue the Macbook. >LANDR is now on version three of their algorithm and it still sucks. Sure, but can you imagine how difficult it must be to implement good automatic mastering? It may be a decade or so until it comes close, but eventually, I bet it'll become a viable option for many bedroom producers.