3 ms·
Wow, what kind of awful sensor technology and low sampling rate are they using for this? You could probably build something that worked better with an Arduino.
by iamleppert 10y ago
Wow, what kind of awful sensor technology and low sampling rate are they using for this? You could probably build something that worked better with an Arduino.
Vehicles equipped with these features are actually more dangerous, based upon the preliminary data. I'm all for new technology, but if you want to use clearly "beta" -- and that's putting it lightly, as its clear there are definite hardware/sensor/sampling problems here, not software -- you should be required to carry high risk insurance.
It's not fair to the rest of us drivers who have to be on the road. We did not agree to be Tesla's beta testers too, and its only a matter of time before someone is seriously injured or killed by one of these "features".
I'm sure someone here will chime in and say, "but its safer than a human driver, a reckless teenager". To that I say, that's why teenager's insurance rates are so high! We need to increase the insurance rates here to reflect the risk presented to both the driver and general public of this reckless, half-backed autonomy.
- firethief 10y ago> You could probably build something that worked better with an Arduino. What are you waiting for?
- toomuchtodo 10y agoOP is waiting for their confidence bias to subside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overconfidence_effect https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overconfidence_effect