Guilty of speed-reading.? 1. As you say, Gawker can report on Hogan's private sex tape. Tacky but newsworthy for tabloids. 2. Gawker cannot distribute Hogan's

Guilty of speed-reading.? 1. As you say, Gawker can report on Hogan's private sex tape. Tacky but newsworthy for tabloids. 2. Gawker cannot distribute Hogan's private sex tape. That would equivalent to Playboy distributing Jennifer Lawrence nudes from The Fappening. 3. Gawker certainly can't ignore requests from judges telling them to take down the private sex tape. You've conflated the first with the second and third. Gawker is mostly getting rapped for the third point to make an example of them. That's the judge's prerogative.