> Implying that this somehow invalidates his argument is a fallacious ad-hominem attack. I did not mean to imply his firing invalidates the article. It was ju

> Implying that this somehow invalidates his argument is a fallacious ad-hominem attack. I did not mean to imply his firing invalidates the article. It was just an observation. You're right, his firing has nothing to do with the pseudoscience of the article, and the pseudoscience invalidates all by itself. This article describes the concept of pseudoscience pretty well [1] [1] https://www.chrisstucchio.com/blog/2016/propublica_is_lying.html https://www.chrisstucchio.com/blog/2016/propublica_is_lying....