> No, it will be because a plutocrat decided to fund a lawsuit unrelated to his reason for disliking them It was directly related his reason for disliking them

> No, it will be because a plutocrat decided to fund a lawsuit unrelated to his reason for disliking them It was directly related his reason for disliking them. In fact, it was practically the same reason. > and apparently influenced the process of that lawsuit with the aim of destroying Gawker to the detriment of Bollea How so? Bollea was already a millionaire; he didn't need the money, and he wasn't materially damaged in any case. He wasn't going after Gawker for the payout; he wanted to see them punished for what they did to him, and dissuaded from doing it to anyone else. This outcome serves his interests much better than a bit of extra money would.