4 ms·
Then we're back to my initial point: they never should have started as one.
by beedogs 10y ago
Then we're back to my initial point: they never should have started as one.
- Dr_tldr 10y agoI imagine you in a grocery store somewhere, railing against free samples. "You never should've given me a piece of sausage if you were going to start charging for them."
- beedogs 10y agoThat is possibly the worst analogy I've ever read on HN.
- tripzilch 10y agoOnly if you speak Dutch.
- briandon 10y agoNot comparable since supermarket in-store free samples are tiny servings of a product you can purchase in the same establishment. Supermarkets wouldn't allow, much less encourage, anyone to consume large numbers of free samples instead of buying the actual for-sale product.
- dave2000 10y agoYou're wrong. It would be awful to live somewhere where you get to choose which companies are allowed to start.
- taneq 10y agoThe problem is that these sites start out as a small, useful service and then some VC with dollar signs in their eyes throws a few million dollars at them. The clothes make the primate, and suddenly what was three guys in a back room living on instant noodles feels obliged to "act like the million-dollar company that they are."