4 ms·
That is so much bullshit. 1. Cite real studies, not paleomom 2. Cite studies that are based on the high-fat, moderate protein people who live a keto lifestyle
by voidlogic 10y ago
That is so much bullshit.
1. Cite real studies, not paleomom
2. Cite studies that are based on the high-fat, moderate protein people who live a keto lifestyle eat, not the high protein diet used for epileptics
#1 is key because if you cite real studies we can talk specifics, all your sources are is paleomom's version of broscience. #2 is important because almost all the low-carb studies that show negative biomarkers are not the LCHF diets recommended by places like /r/keto and other mainstream keto sources.
- nibs 10y agoShe is an MD and PhD in Bio. Her sources are cited in the bottom of the post. Where are your sources? Here are the sources: http://www.thepaleomom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Ketogenic-Diet-Literature-Review.pdf http://www.thepaleomom.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Ketoge...
- voidlogic 10y agoIf you look at the studies she cites many (most that I spot checked) of them are using the formulation of ketogenic diet used to treat epileptics, and not the form that many people advocate as a life-style. Theis is esp. true of the ones that show negative health effects. These diets are low-carb, low-fiber, moderate fat and high protein. The ketogenic diets that are proposed for use by normal people are low-carb, high-fiber, high-fat and moderate protein. So they have a fundamentally different macro-nutrient ratio and include a high volume of low-carb veggies. This formulations also minimize Omega-6 polyunsaturted fat, and many studies listed use that a primary calorie source (there is a depreciated view that this was a healthy fat source). You can find many studies listed here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ketoscience https://www.reddit.com/r/ketoscience