> but are you suggesting that being extremely wealthy is reason enough to give up on privacy? Well not in the strawman form of 'give up on privacy' - but yes,

> but are you suggesting that being extremely wealthy is reason enough to give up on privacy? Well not in the strawman form of 'give up on privacy' - but yes, if the information may be of public interest (I definitely don't think that sex-tapes are fyi) - than the legal standards are different.