Their response time to this sort of thing is dreadful. If their algorithm is this inaccurate and potentially harmful then they need to be responding within at l

Their response time to this sort of thing is dreadful. If their algorithm is this inaccurate and potentially harmful then they need to be responding within at least 3.75 hours to the reporter and within the day they should have a correction that goes out the door. I wish that they had been sued in this case. There's nothing like losing lots of money on lawyers and damages to drive positive change in most large companies. Pity it has to be that way, but it was a calculated risk that nobody would have their reputation harmed by this dodgy algorithm.