4 ms·
> I'm (further) convinced that healthy eating and corporate interests are completely opposed. This is touched on a bit in the Omnivore's Dilemma, people withou
by tetrep 10y ago
> I'm (further) convinced that healthy eating and corporate interests are completely opposed.
This is touched on a bit in the Omnivore's Dilemma, people without heavy encouragement otherwise, have a rough limit on how many calories they will consume in a day. As a food company that has sufficient market penetration, you're stuck growing your profits at the same rate as the population. To get around this, you'll either need to increase your profits per calorie (sell less for more, cheaper ingredients, etc) or increase the amount of calories people are eating, through marketing and/or formulating your foods in such a way to encourage more consumption.
I think most companies opt for both, there's a lot of limits/diminishing returns on the making food cheaper side of things, but on the human consumption side, there's a lot of room for growth until everybody is morbidly obese. The bigger you are, the more calories you need to consume to keep that weight. More calories consumed is more money for food producers.
- simonswords82 10y agoI totally agree with you, but surely some food companies are taking a different approach and that is to charge more for high quality food? Personally I'm very happy to pay a premium for food I know has been prepared with good ingredients.