3 ms·
Or about Daniel's intentions? This is an ugly topic that you simply can't extract a solution for by applying cold logic. It involves, emotions, expectations, r
by partisan 10y ago
Or about Daniel's intentions?
This is an ugly topic that you simply can't extract a solution for by applying cold logic. It involves, emotions, expectations, realities, possibilities, all wrapped up into one document that spells out what will happen if and when your marriage meets it's bitter demise. Read all you want on whether it is right or wrong and postulate as much as you want about it, but when it comes down to it and it's your turn to decide whether you are hedging for or against the success of your marriage, it will be a deeply personal decision that no one will have any right to make calls on.
- wk_end 10y agoAssuming that it were a red flag about Daniel's intentions, what would Daniel's intentions be?
- keyanp 10y agoedit
- pc86 10y ago> They could, for example, be to leave Susan within a relatively short amount of time in order to marry someone younger. And should he do that, it's hard to argue with a straight face that she deserves half of everything. > Or to prevent Susan from having an obvious recourse in the event that Daniel commits adultery. How often to prenups give the cheating party a free pass?
- dragonwriter 10y ago> How often to prenups give the cheating party a free pass? In some states, notably including California, infidelity clauses have been held to be unenforceable provisions in prenuptial agreements, as contrary to public policy (specifically, in CA, that policy as expressed in no-fault divorce laws.) So, if the agreement purports to create penalties for cheating that vary what the distribution of assets would be without it, that provision may not have any legal effect.
- partisan 10y agoTo marry and leave without the typical financial penalties. It's no more or less likely than her intentions being bad.
- hasenj 10y agoPenalties for what?
- wk_end 10y agoWhy would those be Daniel's intentions though? What does he have to gain by doing that? Susan obviously has a tremendous to gain by doing that sans prenup, which is precisely why people perceive her reluctance to get one as a red flag, but unless I'm missing something, Daniel wouldn't really gain anything by doing that except a whole bunch of legal fees. If he wanted to leave her, why marry her?
- hasenj 10y agoHis intentions to protect his assets from unfair laws? How is that a bad intention?