3 ms·
I'm a bit biased, but I don't feel S3 is the best possible fit for a frugal consumer's backup data. S3 is a high performance, general purpose solution capable
by rarrrrrr 17y ago
I'm a bit biased, but I don't feel S3 is the best possible fit for a frugal consumer's backup data. S3 is a high performance, general purpose solution capable of very low latency.
Having that performance makes it more expensive than an archival specific solution, which tolerates latency just fine as long as high throughput is maintained.
There's a reason why Mozy, Carbonite, SpiderOak, etc. all run our own data centers. I can sell a 100GB account for usable across unlimited computers for $50 per year and be profitable.
That said, the market certainly has plenty of room for more backup choices, and any option to help people avoid data loss is a win. An exclusively Mac app seems like a good idea.
- sreitshamer 17y agoI agree. For me though, backup comes down to trust. I trust Amazon to provide the S3 service reliably. I find it harder to trust Mozy, Carbonite and the rest, partly because they don't even bother to restore my Mac files' metadata correctly.