3 ms·
> utilized Not to nitpick but there's a typo. ;-)
by keehun 10y ago
> utilized
Not to nitpick but there's a typo. ;-)
- auvi 10y agoI think you are wrong. Please check: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/utilize http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/utilize
- nkurz 10y agoThe spelling is correct for American and Canadian English, but the grammar is not. Saying "people could utilize" is correct, as is "people could have utilized", but (for whatever reason, and not that it matters) "people could utilized" is never utilised (alternative British Spelling). Also, "would" is arguably better than "could" in this sentence, but it should be clear to the reader either way.