5 ms·
Well after I figured out that I could use clicks to calibrate the tracker it was somewhat accurate (ca. 100-200 px), however hte variance was quite large. I th
by Vespasian 10y ago
Well after I figured out that I could use clicks to calibrate the tracker it was somewhat accurate (ca. 100-200 px), however hte variance was quite large.
I think it's a really nice idea, however not yet precise enough to work for such tasks as user studies
- falcolas 10y ago100px gives you around 70 zones in your average desktop window. More, when you consider shared hits between zones. That's enough to do basic heat maps of a web site (such as for ad impression tracking), coarse navigation, or integration into things like editors/IDEs.
- grenoire 10y agoI was thinking about ad impressions as well; but God forbid websites are ever able to use my camera for eye tracking by bypassing the webcam permissions (or through the removal of in the future? I expect anything when it comes to content monetisation).
- falcolas 10y agoOr simply refusing access to the content without access to the camera (thinking of Forbe's ill-conceived content blocking).
- grenoire 10y agoStop giving them ideas!
- artursapek 10y agoI will laugh my ass off if it ever comes to this. Hopefully I never have to come back to this comment and weep.
- Drdrdrq 10y agoSticker over camera lens takes care of that - in this age of malware it is good to use it anyhow. Good luck tracking my eyes then! Other than thwt, I see huge potential for this in UX studies.
- nileshtrivedi 10y agoNeed something like that for microphones in TV/laptops/tablets.