4 ms·
Your evidence convinces me to agree with your position. On my mind always is the Yahoo Fantasy Football product. In the past few years, the NFL has grown and o
by tgb29 10y ago
Your evidence convinces me to agree with your position.
On my mind always is the Yahoo Fantasy Football product. In the past few years, the NFL has grown and other fantasy products have grown in value. Why was Yahoo not able to do the same? Why didn't they leverage the value of their sports products?
- eonw 10y agoi interviewed as a front end developer for the yahoo fantasy sports team, the tech interview focused on balancing trees... which IMHO is totally unrelated to front end web dev. you wonder why they lost?
- vthallam 10y agoHaha! I heard this kind of experience from some others who interviewed with various companies too. Always wonder why would anyone do that?
- mikestew 10y agoYou know how many linked lists I've had to traverse in interviews? Wanna know how many linked lists I've had to traverse in my daily work in the last 5 years? People do that because they're lazy and/or inexperienced interviewers.
- smitherfield 10y agoWhat language/field do you work in? Usually one of a language's native data types will be implemented as a linked list, and/or something in a popular library will. That said nobody should ever need to roll their own functions for operating on linked lists.
- douche 10y agoLinked lists are slow as shit, most of the time. Even things that looks like they are linked lists, i.e. C#'s List<T>, are really dynamic arrays, akin to std::vector. Cache coherency matters.
- mikestew 10y agoThese days, mostly Objective-C on iOS and Java on Android. Python, mostly, for scripts and quick-and-dirty. Bash for anything else. So, yeah, I haven't seen a lot of linked lists lately. Back in my Microsoft days working mostly with C? You betcha. But I haven't worked there in quite a while.