Pretty much, yes. I think that's what drove the decision to write a law criminalizing "attempts to avoid" rather than anything specific, but it doesn't actuall

Pretty much, yes. I think that's what drove the decision to write a law criminalizing "attempts to avoid" rather than anything specific, but it doesn't actually avoid the paradox. It's a bit of a hazy crime, and one that should be probably only be pursued when there's outside evidence of guilt. As far as I know, the floor is defined by either "this would be too inconvenient even for money launderers" or "the false positive rate is too high to pursue this more strictly".