> the broader play here is worrying: billionaire finances lawsuits he has nothing to do with, in order to take down media entity that he dislikes. Is it? I thi

> the broader play here is worrying: billionaire finances lawsuits he has nothing to do with, in order to take down media entity that he dislikes. Is it? I think it's a lot more worrying the fact that I can only have the protection of the law of if I have a lot of money. If a billionaire helps me with the bills, what's wrong with that?