The problem with SQL DBs is that they just weren't designed for distributed computation to begin with. SQL doesn't take into account CAP theorem - So it lets yo

The problem with SQL DBs is that they just weren't designed for distributed computation to begin with. SQL doesn't take into account CAP theorem - So it lets you write queries which work on a single machine but which cannot scale to multiple machines. On the other hand, many NoSQL databases like MongoDB and RethinkDB have a query language which was designed to run on both single-machines and distributed infrastructure (in a homogeneous way); the same queries which work on a single machine will also work at scale on multiple machines - No need to rewrite your queries as your app grows. You CAN scale with SQL but you have to know what queries to avoid (E.g. table joins, nested queries...) but with NoSQL, you don't have to avoid any queries; if it's in the Docs, it's safe to use. Finally, a major difference between SQL vs NoSQL is the typed vs untyped structure. Most SQL databases were designed in a time when statically typed languages were mainstream; so it made sense for SQL databases to enforce static typing on their data. On the other hand, NoSQL was designed in a time when dynamically typed languages where popular and gaining more popularity (E.g. Ruby, Python, JavaScript); when using these languages, having to add SQL-specific types to data feels like an unnecessary step. With NoSQL you can still enforce a schema in the application code but your schema logic doesn't have to abide by any type constraints from DB layer - Your schema is the ultimate authority on typing of your DB - If gives you the flexibility to be lazy with type-checking in the areas which are low-importance (where errors are tolerable) and strict where data type consistency is paramount. Generally, NoSQL DBs impose constraints to query expressiveness in order to free you from architectural constraints. SQL DBs impose few constraints on query expressiveness but because of this, they add architectural constraints to your system.