3 ms·
A factor that I feel is more important but was sort of glossed over during the article is the fact that it is a competitive disadvantage NOT to do this. The av
by Zyst 10y ago
A factor that I feel is more important but was sort of glossed over during the article is the fact that it is a competitive disadvantage NOT to do this.
The average person is becoming increasingly security conscious, and so are small and medium sized businesses. I seem to remember that Azure was having a really hard time selling to an international audience because foreigners thought the data would be vulnerable in the hands of the US government.
As someone who doesn't live in the US and works in consulting the few years post Snowden were quite curious, with clients who previously didn't mind using cloud solutions like Amazon S3 actively refusing any architecture choices which would lead to having their data stored in the US, even if it meant greater expense.
I really do believe that not taking an approach similar to this where we use End to End encryption and companies minimise their access over their customers data as much as humanly possible can and does lead to lost business.
- stephengillie 10y agoThis is one of the advantages to my employer's cloud product - you can architect your servers and networks entirely outside of the US. Choose only European datacenters, and your data stays in Europe. By the exact same token, if you have a requirement to keep your data in the USA, you can easily design your networks and services to comply.