3 ms·
I cannot agree. I think lots of people (myself included) didn't read the original article and responded purely based on the title. I think that by admitting tha
by FooBarWidget 10y ago
I cannot agree. I think lots of people (myself included) didn't read the original article and responded purely based on the title. I think that by admitting that he didn't read it and that he corrected that later, he's showing humility (that he too is a fallible human) and that gives his article -more- credibility.
- mmm10 10y agoResponding to something without reading it is just stupid. There's no other way to describe such an action.